HNNewShowAskJobs
Built with Tanstack Start
10 Years of Pomological Watercolors(parkerhiggins.net)
171 points by fanf2 12 hours ago | 32 comments
  • thisisparker11 hours ago

    Blog post author here! Always happy to see people looking at and reading about these paintings. Happy to answer any questions or job offers people here may have!

    • schoen4 hours ago |parent

      Hey Parker, congratulations on your NYT daily crossword publications! I solve the Daily every day and have been impressed to see your work there a number of times now.

    • ksherlock9 hours ago |parent

      Thanks for your work. I used one of the pomo pictures in a project a few years back.

    • parkerhiggins9 hours ago |parent

      incredible, impactful, and authentic read!

      • thisisparker9 hours ago |parent

        lol thank you other Parker Higgins, always a pleasure to run into you here

    • biker1425419 hours ago |parent

      Echoing the same thanks! I have used as well personally as technique references and in several projects directly.

  • biker14254110 hours ago

    Oh wow, it's been a decade! I remember this, and was excited to see these released. Nice work!

    This actually inspired me to go out and start (slowly) cataloging mostly historic 100+ yr old landscapes that were locked behind mostly non-US pay-to-access (cough British museums cough), and write a flurry of emails to institutions encouraging uploading high res versions. I'm contemplating a project to put historic paintings "on the map", depicting their geographically represented locations (when applicable), giving a window into the past. Maybe I should circle back on this effort to get more paintings released...

    • CodeLikeHell4 hours ago |parent

      I would absolutely love to see that project come to fruition.

  • interroboink10 hours ago

    If anybody just wants to download the hi-res images, Internet Archive is your friend: https://archive.org/details/usda-pomological-watercolor-coll...

    You can have fun with 'em since they're public domain (:

    Note 1: The metadata, such as title, author, etc. seem to be missing. If anyone knows of a collection with all that included, let me know (it's not in the EXIF either, I spot-checked).

    EDIT: aha! Here is metadata, which you can correlate to the image files: https://github.com/Wumms/pomological

    Note 2: I saw this in the MARC catalog record:

      Use of the images in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Pomological
      Watercolor Collection is not restricted, but a statement of attribution is
      required. Please use the following attribution statement: "U.S. Department
      of Agriculture Pomological Watercolor Collection. Rare and Special
      Collections, National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, MD 20705"
    • biker1425419 hours ago |parent

      I'm also noticing there is no explicit license on the official page. If it's public domain, attribution is not required. If it is not public domain, they should clarify the license (pretty sure this is indeed public domain).

      Ambiguity like this is way too common...

      • interroboink9 hours ago |parent

        Yeah, agreed it's weird.

        For another data point, this catalog.data.gov site[1] lists the license as "us-pd" (ie public domain in the USA). But then yeah, like you said the attribution demand is invalid.

        [1] https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/u-s-department-of-agricultu...

    • msla9 hours ago |parent

      I wonder how the USDA can demand anything regarding images created well before the copyright cutoff of 1929. I strongly suspect that's boilerplate text with no actual force.

      • biker1425414 hours ago |parent

        Oh definitely no force behind it, but just annoying to see. These kinds of issues don't exactly block usage, but can plant a lot of confusion or hesitation for potential users. I wish agencies proactively embraced "please go use this awesome stuff" mentality vs gatekeeping by default.

    • 8 hours ago |parent
      [deleted]
  • winstonrc5 hours ago

    Thanks to your collection, I had an absolute blast going down a silly rabbit hole of compression.

    https://www.winstoncooke.com/blog/rotation-based-compression...

  • snug6 hours ago

    I was scrolling the page looking for links so I could see them all, until i realized the links were just slightly in bold, rather than a different color and underlined. Would be good to highlight the links a little more on your site.

    Awesome work either way!

    • thisisparker6 hours ago |parent

      good shout, I think some recent typography changes made the bolding more subtle on mobile. I've pushed an update underlining them and it should be live momentarily!

      • snug4 hours ago |parent

        Ahh yes, much better

  • sorokod12 hours ago

    Thank you Parker Higgins, these are quite lovely.

  • namanyayg11 hours ago

    Became friends with Parker during my time at the Recurse Center. He's even more obsessed (in a good way) and funny in person! Glad to see his post on the top of HN.

  • __mharrison__7 hours ago

    I think I'm going to print a few of these for my office. Thanks thisisparker

  • esquivalience12 hours ago

    > " This was my first ever project in Python, and in many ways, the start of my life as a programmer. The domino effect here is a little mind-boggling for me."

    I can certainly relate to this. I started scripting for very obtuse reasons, and quickly started seeing things everywhere which I could apply a little code to and improve my life.

  • anothernewdude5 hours ago

    What on earth is Pornological about these?

    • jihadjihadan hour ago |parent

      Evil Lord Keming strikes again!

    • Cerium4 hours ago |parent

      Bad keming joke? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomology

  • DrillShopper12 hours ago

    There's a related story from the USDA about these: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44287019

  • dfex3 hours ago

    Read this as pornological. Came away disappointed.

  • smidgeon12 hours ago

    Nice apples.

    • 12 hours ago |parent
      [deleted]
  • jandrese12 hours ago

    [flagged]

    • dhosek12 hours ago |parent

      poMological nor poRNological

    • 12 hours ago |parent
      [deleted]